Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Gulf nations urge U.S. to stop Israel’s attack on Iranian oil facilities to prevent escalation.
{Current column}69People have watched
IntroductionAccording to multiple sources, Gulf countries are jointly pressuring the United States to prevent Is ...
According to multiple sources,fxcm Fuhui Forex Chinese official website Gulf countries are jointly pressuring the United States to prevent Israel from carrying out any military strikes on Iran's oil facilities. Several Gulf nations, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, have explicitly stated their refusal to allow Israel to use their airspace to attack Iran, aiming to minimize the risk of regional conflict. Israel is currently assessing its response options to last week's airstrike by Iran, while Iran has openly declared that it will retaliate harshly if attacked.
Iran has previously warned Gulf countries that if they assist in Israel's military operations, Iran will not guarantee the safety of their oil facilities. This threat has made the Gulf countries more cautious, as despite OPEC's capability to handle short-term oil supply disruptions, many oil facilities are within Iran's reach, causing the Gulf nations to tread carefully.
Meanwhile, the U.S. government also has to consider the concerns of the Gulf countries, especially in the event of potential disruptions to global oil supplies. U.S. insiders point out that if oil prices surge to $120 per barrel, it would negatively impact the American economy and could threaten Harris's election prospects. The White House has yet to comment on the matter but stated that President Biden's recent call with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu made positive progress.
The Gulf countries further emphasize that most will not permit Israeli planes or missiles to traverse their airspace, though Israel might launch airstrikes through alternative routes such as Jordan or Iraq. The uncertainty of this conflict poses new risks to the global energy market, especially if Gulf countries' oil facilities also become targets, which would severely impact global oil supply.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
SQLQD has demanded me a $950 “security verification charge”
{Current column}This fee was never mentioned during registration or anywhere in their terms. Despite completing full ...
Read moreBit Peak is requiring a $1,850 “final account processing fee” before they can release my funds.
{Current column}This new fee wasn’t disclosed anywhere, and I’ve already completed all the necessary steps. I’m bein ...
Read moreAvafundify told me to pay a $2,000 “final authorization tax” before my funds can be accessed.
{Current column}Avafundify never mentioned this during onboarding or verification. Everything was supposedly approve ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Gold prices may reach $3,000 by year
- AVA Global claims I owe a $1,800 "final transaction fee" before I can withdraw my funds.
- Crypto Zoid demanded a $2,500 “release confirmation tax.” This is now the fourth surprise fee.
- Novai Chain claims I need to pay a $1,700 "fund verification fee"
- Canada's July GDP beat expectations, fueling interest rate cut speculation.
- SRS Tradings added a $2,050 “disbursement delay charge” as a required step.
Latest articles
-
Geminifin to Apply for FCA License, Expanding UK Presence.
-
HUOE has informed me that I must pay a $2,000 "transaction confirmation fee"
-
SRS Tradings added a $2,050 “disbursement delay charge” as a required step.
-
FX Partners is insisting I pay a $2,500 "processing clearance fee" to access my funds.
-
Geminifin to Apply for FCA License, Expanding UK Presence.
-
CANYON is now demanding a $1,900 “withdrawal confirmation fee”