Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump 2.0 Policy: Tariffs First, Tax Cuts Later, Driving a "Goldilocks" Economy.
{Current column}981People have watched
IntroductionFour Major Policy Impact SpeculationsUncertain Impact of Tariffs on InflationHistorical data shows t ...

Four Major Policy Impact Speculations
- Uncertain Impact of Tariffs on Inflation
Historical data shows that the impact of tariffs on inflation is not straightforward. When deflationary risks outweigh inflationary risks, tariffs have a minimal effect on prices. However, the U.S. economy currently faces inflation stickiness. If Trump enacts widespread tariff policies, it may increase inflationary pressure, but the government might adopt a cautious approach to control risks. - Fiscal Deficit May Contract Before Expanding
If tariff increases and spending cuts pace faster than tax reductions, the fiscal stance may initially tighten. The U.S. might pursue a "tight fiscal, loose monetary, broad credit" policy mix in the future. With Federal Reserve rate cuts and regulatory easing, the financial cycle is expected to rise, continuing economic expansion. - "Goldilocks" Economy May Continue
If tariffs do not trigger significant inflation and the fiscal deficit remains manageable, the U.S. economy could continue to be in a "moderate" state—neither high inflation nor large-scale unemployment. The Federal Reserve may cut rates in the first half of 2025, making monetary policy more neutral, moving to a wait-and-see phase in the second half, adjusting based on Trump’s policy outcomes. - Intensifying Global Economic Divergence
Countries facing tariffs may encounter reduced export demand, worsening trade conditions, and currency devaluation. Increased tariffs might prompt other countries to intensify monetary easing, keeping the dollar strong. This would pressure commodity prices and bond yields, likely intensifying global market divergence.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
SilverFx24Option unexpectedly demanded a $1,900 “final payout clearance fee”
{Current column}This fee was nowhere to be found in the terms or agreements I signed. I submitted all verification d ...
Read moreThe Bank of England's new dilemma: Wage growth outpaces inflation
{Current column}On Tuesday, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that the UK’s unemployment rat ...
Read moreToday's Market Focus: China Fully Suspends Imports of Japanese Aquatic Products
{Current column}Market ReviewKey HighlightsChinese Market1. China Securities Regulatory Commission: It's the Ri ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- New accounts at FOREX.com can receive up to $5000 in bonuses.
- Assets related to China are losing their "heat."
- China and Japan's holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds have dropped to a historic low.
- New evidence of cooling in the US job market: Wages for new employees are falling
- GlobeInvestFX required me to pay a $980 account clearance payment
- Today's market focus: The U.S. Department of Labor significantly reduced the workforce.
Latest articles
-
[Early Trade] Slight Cooling in Demand, Gold Prices Continue to Fluctuate
-
Japan reports that the radioactivity in seawater near Fukushima is below the limit.
-
Fukushima nuclear wastewater release raises concerns, causing market volatility and trade issues.
-
German unemployment surges, job market plunges into crisis
-
The U.S. Justice Department introduces new rules to limit foreign access to sensitive data.
-
Australia and the European Union join forces, reigniting free trade negotiations.