Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump plans WHO withdrawal on day one, experts warn of global health impacts.
{Current column}9223People have watched
IntroductionThe Financial Times website reported on December 22 that President-elect Trump's team is pushin ...

The Financial Times website reported on December 22 that President-elect Trump's team is pushing for the U.S. to announce its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) on the first day of his presidency. According to sources, this decision may be officially announced on January 20, the day Trump takes the oath of office.
The report, quoting expert opinions, states that as the largest financial contributor to the WHO, the U.S. withdrawal would have a "catastrophic" impact on global public health. The WHO faces the risk of significant budget cuts and could lose crucial support in dealing with global public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Experts warn that this move would severely weaken the WHO's ability to coordinate global health affairs, particularly hindering efforts in vaccine development, disease prevention, and health infrastructure support. Moreover, the U.S. exit from the WHO might trigger a ripple effect in the international community, exacerbating resource scarcity and uncertainty in global health governance.
Trump's team has not yet officially commented on this plan, but the news has already sparked widespread discussion. Many public health experts and international organizations have expressed concern about this possibility, urging the new administration to reconsider the decision to avoid irreversible negative impacts on global public health security.
Background Analysis
The U.S. previously announced its withdrawal from the WHO in 2020, but the Biden administration rejoined in 2021. Trump's team once again pushing for an exit from the WHO raises profound concerns about U.S. health policy and prospects for global cooperation. How the international community will respond to potential changes will be a major challenge for global health governance.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Canada's July GDP beat expectations, fueling interest rate cut speculation.
{Current column}Statistics Canada reports that the Canadian economy grew by 0.2% in July, exceeding analysts' o ...
Read moreTrump urges Republicans to counter Democrats' nomination delays amid escalating tensions.
{Current column}Trump Criticizes Democrats for Blocking Nominations, Urges Republicans to be FirmRecently, U.S. Pres ...
Read moreWall Street warns Trump's immigration policy could harm labor
{Current column}U.S. President Trump's tough stance on immigration policy has drawn widespread attention from W ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Biden accelerates chip subsidies, TSMC and GlobalFoundries nearing U.S. plant agreement
- Trudeau may resign as Liberal leader today, sparking turmoil and possible early election.
- South Korean President Yoon faces a crucial impeachment trial shaping the nation's future.
- Trump, convicted of 34 felonies, released unconditionally, to return to White House while appealing.
- Israel kills Hamas leader, gold prices hit historical highs due to geopolitical risks.
- US bond yield surge triggers turbulence, Bitcoin plummets, risk assets pressured.
Latest articles
-
CloudtradesFX informed me that I can not make withdrawal
-
Jimmy Carter's state funeral honored his role in U.S.
-
The U.S. announces nearly $6 billion in aid to Ukraine for budget support and military equipment.
-
Brazilian oil overtakes soybeans as top export, with nearly half sent to China.
-
Bozei Upgrades Website Technology
-
Wall Street warns Trump's immigration policy could harm labor