Japanese companies oppose interest rate hikes to address the tariff crisis.

As the Japanese economy reaches a critical turning point, domestic companies are strongly opposing the central bank's continued interest rate hikes. According to a latest survey released by Nikkei Research in mid-May, nearly two-thirds of Japanese companies explicitly demand that the Bank of Japan halt rate increases, with 10% even advocating for rate cuts. This outcry highlights the multiple pressures facing the Japanese economy, particularly the uncertainty stemming from the U.S. Trump administration's tariff policies.

The survey covered 504 companies, with 224 choosing to respond anonymously. Results show that 65% of companies are requesting to pause rate hikes, 10% support rate cuts, and only 25% favor continuing hikes. Against the backdrop of an unexpected contraction in Japan's first-quarter GDP, business confidence is evidently shaken.

Trump Tariffs Create Strategic Confusion

Company executives widely expressed puzzlement over U.S. policy directions. A service industry executive candidly stated that Trump's tariff policy is like a "cloud that cannot be dispelled," hindering corporate decision-making. Some manufacturing and electronic export companies are particularly worried about the "double blows" of tariffs and yen appreciation—facing pressure from U.S. tax increases while also bearing the profit squeeze from local currency appreciation.

63% of Companies Expect Profit Impact

Profit expectations have also turned red. About 9% of the surveyed companies expect to encounter "severe negative impact," another 54% anticipate "moderate impact," and not a single company believes the tariffs are beneficial. This pessimism is forcing some companies to pass costs onto consumers, though this could further dampen domestic demand.

A chemical enterprise executive noted, "We are highly tied with Japan's auto exports, and if car sales drop, our orders will quickly decrease." The survey also found that when facing profit pressure, most companies choose to maintain their operational structures, only adjusting strategies on the sales side.

Differences Evident in Interest Rate Timing

Among the minority supporting rate hikes, significant differences emerged regarding the timing: 42% believe actions should be withheld until the fourth quarter of 2025, while 36% advocate for rate increases in the third quarter of this year. This divergence reflects a lack of consensus among companies on the pace of economic recovery.

A machinery industry official pointed out, "Raising rates now could stifle initial recovery, but waiting too long might cause inflation to spiral out of control." This "dilemma" makes monetary policy formulation increasingly complex.

Wage Pressure Coexists with Population Crisis

Despite facing profit pressures, 83% of companies stated they would not adjust their established wage increase plans. The reason is that Japan faces a serious labor shortage. Companies emphasized that maintaining a competitive salary structure is a "survival bottom line," otherwise they cannot retain or even attract basic personnel.

A senior executive in a machinery manufacturing company admitted, "Even facing tariff risks, we cannot stop the pace of wage increases. The labor shortage is a more urgent crisis than profit declines."

Bank of Japan's Policy Dilemma

Economists warn that the Bank of Japan is on a policy path fraught with pitfalls. On one hand, inflation pressures and yen fluctuations require a gradual exit from ultra-loose policy; on the other, economic contraction and external tariff risks urgently necessitate monetary support. Analysts believe that Japan's current predicament is a complex structural problem formed under double external and internal pressures.

As the U.S. Federal Reserve's June rate decision approaches, the global monetary environment will change again. How the Bank of Japan makes balanced decisions in this backdrop will largely determine whether the world's third-largest economy will slip into the dangerous territory of "stagflation."

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.