Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Victorious! U.S. Appeals Court Rules: Starbucks Must Rehire Union Supporters!
{Current column}977People have watched
IntroductionOn Tuesday, the U.S. federal appeals court rejected Starbucks' appeal against a verdict that or ...
On Tuesday,lcm foreign exchange dealer the U.S. federal appeals court rejected Starbucks' appeal against a verdict that ordered Starbucks to rehire seven employees who were fired for allegedly supporting a union.
Judges from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ohio believed that firing those employees last year could have negative consequences that might deter other employees from exercising their legitimate rights under U.S. labor law.
Judge Danny Boggs stated that the reason for the firings was clearly the employees' support for the union, and without reinstating them, Starbucks would be at risk of reprisal.
This decision could motivate the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to take stronger legal measures to increase oversight of Starbucks' actions. Meanwhile, the NLRB itself is under scrutiny by shareholders and the U.S. Congress.
Starbucks and the labor board did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Last year, Starbucks stated that it had rehired the seven employees in compliance with the judge’s order but continued to appeal the decision.
The Starbucks store in Memphis is one of the nearly 300 coffee shops that have recently joined the union, an area Starbucks had not ventured into for decades. Moreover, over 600 complaints have been filed with the labor board, accusing Starbucks of illegal labor practices such as firing union supporters, monitoring employees, and closing stores during labor movements.
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing Starbucks' appeal against a February ruling that prohibited the company from firing or punishing employees at an Ann Arbor, Michigan, coffee shop. Other U.S. appellate courts are considering labor board rulings that found Starbucks' firing of union organizers in Philadelphia and refusal to negotiate with unionized employees in Seattle to be illegal.
Starbucks vehemently denies any misconduct, asserting that it provides competitive wages and benefits to its employees and respects their rights under federal labor law.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Personal Analysis of Gold on August 1:
{Current column}New Month, August 1st - Personal Subjective Analysis of Gold:The July rate decision, announced early ...
Read moreTrend following in swing trading is about adhering to the trend, not predicting it.
{Current column}Wave trading trends are about maintaining, not predicting.In trading, beginners often fear the uncer ...
Read moreWhy are forex deposit and withdrawal channels private? What types are there?
{Current column}Preface: Recently, many friends from other industries have been asking about forex-related issues, a ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Biden accelerates chip subsidies, TSMC and GlobalFoundries nearing U.S. plant agreement
- Japan's central bank policy: Consider rate tweaks after achieving 2% inflation.
- The Essence of Theory
- [Daily Morning Report 5.23]
- Subjective Personal Analysis on Gold for 7/30:
- [May 6, 2024 Daily Morning Market Update]
Latest articles
-
Initial jobless claims in the United States drop to a four
-
[Daily Morning Roundup 5.20]
-
Amazon deepens AI work, partners with Hugging Face.
-
Tesla's new compensation plan has been revealed, valued at approximately $46 billion.
-
My Precious Metals Investment Journey: Macro Bullion, From Choice to Trust
-
UK's biggest fine since 2008 crisis! Citibank fined nearly $80 million.