Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Disney, Fox, Warner plan joint venture; monopoly concerns by two lawmakers.
{Current column}53926People have watched
IntroductionMonopoly and anti-monopoly have always been one of the main contradictions in the American business ...
Monopoly and tr foreign exchange NFT withdrawalanti-monopoly have always been one of the main contradictions in the American business world. In February this year, three media industry giants, Disney, Fox, and Warner Brothers, jointly announced plans to establish a new joint streaming platform in the fall. This will integrate the sports assets owned by the three parties, offering consumers a new way to watch major sports events.
However, this plan has recently encountered opposition. US Congressmen Jerry Nadler and Joaquin Castro expressed their concerns about this plan on Tuesday. They believe that this alliance could lead to monopolistic practices, resulting in price increases for consumers and serious monopolistic competition as well as unfair terms for the industry's vertical and horizontal players.
According to the original plan, this platform will be different from traditional cable TV. It is mainly aimed at sports audiences and includes broadcasting rights for all sports programs under Disney, ESPN+, Fox, and Warner Brothers. Insiders revealed that the subscription fee for this platform could be between $45 to $50 per month.
Currently, the platform holds the rights to the main sports in the United States, including the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, and a large number of professional and college leagues, virtually covering the broadcasting rights for all mainstream sports in the United States.
The scale of this collaboration is so large that it cannot be undertaken by any one party alone. Therefore, a new company will be established to operate independently, with Disney, Fox, and Warner Brothers' Discovery Channel each holding a one-third stake in the new company. This platform will be linked to the existing streaming services of these three companies through a new app.
Since its announcement, this plan has faced widespread skepticism, mainly concerning anti-monopoly issues. FuboTV filed an antitrust lawsuit against the three companies and their associates shortly after the news was announced, accusing them of engaging in monopolistic practices over the long term, hindering the development of new streaming services related to sports, and stating that the new joint venture is their latest step towards eliminating competition to form a monopoly.
So far, the three companies have not responded to or commented on the antitrust concerns.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Trump’s election may worsen Europe’s crisis; Deutsche Bank cuts euro forecast.
{Current column}Trump's victory in this week's U.S. election has immediately sparked concerns in European ...
Read moreBAITE WEALTH demanded a $1,970 “cross
{Current column}That alone made no sense. I asked them why this applied, and they just repeated, “It’s part of the s ...
Read moreOcta Capital X decided to halt my withdrawal unless I paid a $1,840 “security confirmation fee”
{Current column}I completed all their KYC steps, and they approved my account, confirming everything was ready for w ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Bitcoin falls below $70,000, sparking a pullback in crypto stocks amid macro shifts.
- Apex Orbit claims I owe a $1,530 “final balance security fee” before they can release my money
- I feel deceived since Trade Pulse now claims a “liquidity processing fee” is mandatory.
- Just when I thought my withdrawal was coming, Bit Mine Forex demanded a “liquidity check fee.”
- Iran may attack Israel, raising Middle East tensions and oil price fluctuations.
- I couldn’t believe Zenith would demand a “security compliance fee” with no prior disclosure.
Latest articles
-
Rotabit Applies Advanced Network Technology
-
Just when I thought my withdrawal was coming, Bit Mine Forex demanded a “liquidity check fee.”
-
Globalfxtrade was eager for my deposit, but now says I need to pay a “risk fee” to withdraw.
-
I’m shocked ExtrodigitalPro suddenly decided a “security handling fee” is needed now.
-
Oil giants fear Middle East conflict, expect rising demand, adding energy transition pressure.
-
I was surprised that Viciation demanded a “transaction review fee” without prior communication.