Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump demands greater concessions from Ukraine in new agreement.
{Current column}5People have watched
IntroductionThe Trump administration is exerting greater pressure by proposing a new draft economic agreement th ...

The Trump administration is exerting greater pressure by proposing a new draft economic agreement that requires Ukraine to make more significant concessions in return for U.S. aid. The draft demands Ukraine to relinquish profits from future economic projects to offset the financial and military assistance provided by the U.S. since the conflict began in 2022. Ukrainian MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak publicly discussed the draft’s contents in a YouTube video and noted that passing the draft would be particularly challenging, especially when it comes to approval by the Ukrainian parliament.
The draft requires Ukraine to remit not only profits from mineral projects but also from oil and gas resources, impacting both state-owned and private enterprises. Unlike the previous framework agreement negotiated between Kyiv and Washington, the new version significantly increases the demands on Ukraine. This agreement was originally intended to be signed by Ukrainian President Zelensky and Trump before their meeting on February 28th.
The new draft would not only impose a substantial financial responsibility on Ukraine but could also affect the country's resource development and economic prospects. The amount requested by the Trump administration varies according to different estimates; Ukraine estimates U.S. aid at $100 billion, while Trump has repeatedly mentioned a figure of $350 billion. Trump demands Ukraine use the revenue from these resource projects to compensate for previous U.S. aid to maintain ongoing support.
This draft reflects stronger U.S. pressure on Ukraine, but the Ukrainian side has expressed concerns that the passage of this agreement could face significant challenges.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Biden accelerates chip subsidies, TSMC and GlobalFoundries nearing U.S. plant agreement
{Current column}As the Biden administration prepares to leave office, it is accelerating the distribution of subsidi ...
Read moreForexflowCapital just sent me a message saying I need to pay a $2,050
{Current column}This charge was never discussed during signup, and there’s no mention of it in their terms and condi ...
Read morePim Crest Market just emailed me demanding a $2,000 "risk management verification fee"
{Current column}Are they serious? I've never heard of such a fee in any real financial institution. They never ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- CloudtradesFX informed me that I can not make withdrawal
- VTradax says I owe a $2,000 “profit verification fee” before I can receive my withdrawal
- HUOE now claims I need to cover a $2,200 “cross
- Eqantumarc Solutions is now requiring a $1,650 “final validation fee” before releasing my funds.
- [Breaking News] Macro Bullion
- HUOE now claims I need to cover a $2,200 “cross
Latest articles
-
China's September export growth hit a five
-
LinxVista is refusing to process my payout unless I pay a $2,100 “manual fund disbursement fee.”
-
Westock Broker has now blindsided me with a sudden demand for a $1,600 withdrawal fee.
-
Hinteck told me today that I need to pay a $1,690 “profit confirmation levy”
-
GlobeInvestFX required me to pay a $980 account clearance payment
-
Igenuis Trade has shocked me by demanding a $1,300 fee labeled as a 'final withdrawal step.