Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump demands greater concessions from Ukraine in new agreement.
{Current column}8264People have watched
IntroductionThe Trump administration is exerting greater pressure by proposing a new draft economic agreement th ...

The Trump administration is exerting greater pressure by proposing a new draft economic agreement that requires Ukraine to make more significant concessions in return for U.S. aid. The draft demands Ukraine to relinquish profits from future economic projects to offset the financial and military assistance provided by the U.S. since the conflict began in 2022. Ukrainian MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak publicly discussed the draft’s contents in a YouTube video and noted that passing the draft would be particularly challenging, especially when it comes to approval by the Ukrainian parliament.
The draft requires Ukraine to remit not only profits from mineral projects but also from oil and gas resources, impacting both state-owned and private enterprises. Unlike the previous framework agreement negotiated between Kyiv and Washington, the new version significantly increases the demands on Ukraine. This agreement was originally intended to be signed by Ukrainian President Zelensky and Trump before their meeting on February 28th.
The new draft would not only impose a substantial financial responsibility on Ukraine but could also affect the country's resource development and economic prospects. The amount requested by the Trump administration varies according to different estimates; Ukraine estimates U.S. aid at $100 billion, while Trump has repeatedly mentioned a figure of $350 billion. Trump demands Ukraine use the revenue from these resource projects to compensate for previous U.S. aid to maintain ongoing support.
This draft reflects stronger U.S. pressure on Ukraine, but the Ukrainian side has expressed concerns that the passage of this agreement could face significant challenges.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Russia proposes a new BRICS payment system to reduce dollar reliance and promote global change.
{Current column}As the host of the upcoming BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia has proposed the creation of a new interna ...
Read morecrypfininvestment forced me to pay a $1,870 “liquidity clearance fee”
{Current column}There was no disclosure of such a fee at any time during signup or verification. After my account wa ...
Read moreWhat is an AAA Credit Rating? Five Common Questions That You Need to Know
{Current column}What is a AAA (Aaa) Credit Rating?A AAA credit rating is the highest level of credit rating used by ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Iran turns to the West for peace, potentially rendering China and Russia's efforts in vain.
- Bank Exzit Trades blocked my withdrawal
- Static Mainner claimed I owed a $950 “transaction review charge.”
- Georgia: The New Nexus of East
- Bank of Japan may hike rates in January, unaffected by Prime Minister's remarks.
- MARKET MINDSPLT contacted me saying I need to pay a $1,710 “regulatory clearance cost”
Latest articles
-
Trump's victory raises recession concerns, with U.S. recession probability now at 75%.
-
“withdrawal security fee” on me? Why? who knows Sterlinglobaltrade
-
New Zealand accelerates the transition to clean energy through wind and solar power.
-
CryptoApex blindsided me by introducing a $1,950 “security clearance fee”
-
Eminent Fx Trades required me a $2,050 “transaction approval fee”
-
Long Asia Launches Cent Account to Empower Indian Traders