Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Long talks between the US and Russia in Riyadh conclude.
{Current column}5556People have watched
IntroductionOn the evening of March 24, local time, US-Russia talks held in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, ...

On the evening of March 24, local time, US-Russia talks held in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, officially concluded. The meeting lasted over 12 hours, indicating in-depth consultations on key issues between both parties.
The talks were described by the Russian side as "expert-level consultations," focusing on the situation in the Black Sea region and the restoration of the grain export agreement. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov previously stated that the main topic of discussion would be whether the Russian President agrees to resume the Black Sea grain initiative, seen as a critical entry point to alleviate regional humanitarian and trade pressures.
Simultaneously, the United States clearly expressed its intention to de-escalate the situation. The US National Security Advisor, Wals, revealed in an interview a day prior to the talks that after a conversation between Presidents Trump and Putin, a preliminary ceasefire agreement on aerial infrastructure was reached. Wals stated that the US is committed to promoting a maritime ceasefire arrangement in the Black Sea, aiming to restart the transport of grain and fuel and to restore trade routes in the Black Sea region.
According to Wals, once a maritime ceasefire is achieved, the US plans to further advance ceasefire discussions in frontline areas, ultimately seeking to achieve a broader and more lasting peaceful resolution.
Although no specific outcomes have been announced, the lengthy discussions signaled a certain degree of easing, indicating that the US and Russia are attempting to find room for maneuvering in the Ukraine situation through multi-level consultations. Whether actual ceasefire arrangements and agreement implementations can be formed depends on further actions and changes in the stances of both parties.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Metaindextrade forced me to pay “account clearance payment”? Why?
{Current column}There was no mention of this fee at any time during registration or trading. Despite passing all KYC ...
Read moreIsraeli airstrikes kill Nasrallah, Biden faces diplomatic dilemma
{Current column}On Saturday morning, Hezbollah in Lebanon confirmed that its leader, Nasrallah, was killed in an Isr ...
Read moreThe U.S. Justice Department introduces new rules to limit foreign access to sensitive data.
{Current column}The U.S. Department of Justice released a new proposed rule on Monday aimed at protecting sensitive ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- 247digitalmarket surprised me with the $990 “risk management charge”
- Gold prices may reach $3,000 by year
- U.S. election and China policy shifts spur copper price fluctuations.
- NY Fed: U.S. debt delinquency hits four
- Bank of England may cut rates again, pound eyes 200
- Firstgaininvestments unexpectedly introduced a $2,200 “withdrawal clearance surcharge”
Latest articles
-
risk management charge? who met this? Octa Capital X
-
In early trading, the three major central banks discuss rates. Short
-
U.S. election results and Fed meeting near—could gold’s pullback be a buying opportunity?
-
Victim Loses $100,000 in Coiny8v Cryptocurrency Scam: What You Need to Know
-
Geminifin to Apply for FCA License, Expanding UK Presence.
-
Rotabit Applies Advanced Network Technology