Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
The White House's pressure fails to mend party rifts, hindering progress of the tax cut bill.
{Current column}7People have watched
IntroductionOn May 22, the U.S. White House intensified pressure on Republican lawmakers, urging the swift passa ...
On May 22,Is Huiyuan Foreign Exchange Platform formal? the U.S. White House intensified pressure on Republican lawmakers, urging the swift passage of President Trump's signature tax cut bill and issuing a stern warning that any obstruction would be seen as "the ultimate betrayal." Despite some legislative progress, conservative opposition within the Republican Party continues to grow, posing significant uncertainty for the bill.
In a memorandum supporting the bill, the White House Office of Management and Budget stated, "The House should immediately pass the tax reform bill to demonstrate to the American people their firm commitment to their promises. President Trump has always been true to his word."
To advance the bill, House Speaker Mike Johnson announced he had reached an agreement with high-tax state lawmakers to raise the "State and Local Tax" (SALT) deduction limit to $40,000 to win over some previously opposing lawmakers. However, this compromise did not quell the dissatisfaction among hardliners.
Conservative lawmakers accused the Republican leadership of failing to deliver on previous policy promises made by the White House, particularly on Medicaid cuts and the cancellation of green energy tax incentives. Maryland Representative Andy Harris revealed there had been "late-night deals" with hardliners, including significant Medicaid budget cuts and the removal of clean energy incentive policies. He stressed, "The Speaker has no authority to make such promises."
The White House denied reaching any agreement with conservatives. An official stated the White House only listed a range of acceptable policy options and clearly informed them they must secure middle-ground support on their own. With the Republican House governing by a slim margin and internal divisions, coordination challenges are apparent.
Trump and Johnson were scheduled to meet with some far-right lawmakers at the White House at 3 p.m. on Wednesday, trying to push internal deals. However, Texas conservative Representative Chip Roy warned that the current stage is "far from success."
The Freedom Caucus emphasized that they do not oppose the overall direction of tax cuts but want to add budget cuts within the existing framework, curb Medicaid "abuse," and immediately eliminate green energy-related exemptions. The House Republican leadership is considering advancing the effective date for Medicaid work requirements from the originally planned 2029 to 2026 to appease conservatives.
However, this adjustment could have political repercussions. Some Republican lawmakers representing swing districts worry that this move might be attacked by Democrats as cutting medical benefits for low-income groups in the midterm elections. Additionally, pushing this measure through the Senate will also face strong opposition.
Mike Lawler, a moderate Republican congressman from New York, said in an interview on Wednesday morning that although there are still "technical details" to handle, he is "cautiously optimistic" about reaching an agreement later in the day.
As of now, the fate of the tax cut bill remains full of variables. The balancing and divisions within the Republican Party complicate its progress, and whether this bill, seen by Trump as a core economic agenda, can finally be passed by the House remains to be seen, depending on whether effective compromises can be reached between the White House and Congress.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Personal Analysis of Gold on August 1:
{Current column}New Month, August 1st - Personal Subjective Analysis of Gold:The July rate decision, announced early ...
Read moreMarketsblu is now forcing me to pay a $1,700 “exit processing fee” to release my funds.
{Current column}This term was never shown during registration, and no documentation was provided before this. I’ve d ...
Read more10xgrowthmarket claims they need a $1,300 “government handling fee”
{Current column}What a joke! No actual broker charges this. I asked for a breakdown or proof it’s required by any ag ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Eminent Fx Trades required me a $2,050 “transaction approval fee”
- Gdm Investments Ltd suddenly introduced a $2,300 “post
- Global Flip Investment is now forcing me to pay a $2,200 “transaction eligibility fee”
- Sansom Asset now demands I pay a $1,980 “regulatory disbursement charge” before releasing my funds.
- [Early Trade] Slight Cooling in Demand, Gold Prices Continue to Fluctuate
- Belcher Investments Markets suddenly demanded a $2,000 “fund validation charge”
Latest articles
-
CrypticBitFx informed me I need to pay a “withdrawal processing fee”
-
Oxlore Trades now demands a $2,250 “exit clearance fee” to approve my withdrawal.
-
Oxlore Trades now demands a $2,250 “exit clearance fee” to approve my withdrawal.
-
FxBennyLtd told me today that my account needs a “liquidity clearance fee” of $980
-
Biden accelerates chip subsidies, TSMC and GlobalFoundries nearing U.S. plant agreement
-
Probexmart suddenly added a $1,950 “account upgrade fee”