Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Powell emphasized the Fed's independence, noting a strong economy and budget deficit concerns.
{Current column}921People have watched
IntroductionIn an interview on December 4, Federal Reserve Chairman Powell emphasized that the Federal Reserve w ...

In an interview on December 4, Federal Reserve Chairman Powell emphasized that the Federal Reserve was created by Congress to represent all Americans and is not influenced by politics. He explicitly stated that the Federal Reserve would maintain its independence and oppose any suggestions by the President to comment on interest rate policies. Powell stressed that the Federal Reserve should not be subjected to political interference, and decisions should be based on economic data and long-term stability.
Regarding the U.S. economy, Powell noted that inflation is gradually decreasing, and the unemployment rate remains low, making the current economic situation "very good." He also emphasized that the U.S. economy is stronger than anticipated in September, allowing the Federal Reserve to take a more cautious approach when considering interest rate cuts. He mentioned that although inflation has not fully returned to the Federal Reserve's 2% target, the momentum of economic growth is strong, and there is no need to rush into cutting interest rates at this time.
Addressing the fiscal situation of the United States, Powell warned that the federal budget is on an "unsustainable path" and stated that this issue must be resolved as soon as possible to ensure long-term economic stability. He believes that the U.S. needs to take measures to reduce the budget deficit and prevent debt levels from continuing to rise, which could impact sustainable economic growth.
Powell's comments once again indicate that the Federal Reserve will continue to base its cautious monetary policy on economic data and not make hasty decisions influenced by short-term political factors.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
kriskopy imposed a $1,860 “security audit fee” , anyone met this? I need help
{Current column}This fee was never communicated during account opening or verification. I assumed withdrawals would ...
Read moreBank Exzit Trades now says I have to pay a $1,760 “security confirmation fee”
{Current column}I have checked all their user agreements and policies, and this fee was never listed or mentioned at ...
Read moreObrbanc decided out of nowhere that I must pay a $1,880 “security clearance fee”
{Current column}This was never communicated when I joined, nor was it in any of their policies or user agreements. T ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Huawei HarmonyOS Night scheduled, Mate 70 mass
- BitStockTrades is holding my withdrawal hostage over a made
- I was blindsided when investmentco suddenly required a “compliance audit fee”
- Equityzonestakes demanded a $1,670 “compliance
- “final payout processing charge”? betalivetradepro forced me to pay this, why?
- Swisssborg just introduced a $2,000 “client release processing fee”
Latest articles
-
Autobot Asset shocked me by demanding “risk management fee”
-
They approved everything, but Elixo Trade now stalls with a “risk clearance fee.”
-
Sound Reinvesting blindsided me with a demand for a $2,180 “compliance audit fee”
-
I didn’t expect Vinralpro to block my funds over a “processing verification fee.”
-
Rotabit Applies Advanced Network Technology
-
I was stunned to see OrsbergNfts insist on a “compliance handling fee”