Debate over Interest Rate Cut Resurfaces, Wall Street Divided

Unclear Fed Rate Cut Path, September Decision Still Uncertain

Despite growing expectations for the Federal Reserve to initiate a rate cut this year, there remains a lack of consensus both on Wall Street and within the Fed about the exact timing. Some institutions are betting on a September start for easing, while others urge caution in releasing policy space to avoid being constrained by inflation resurgence.

Institutions like Goldman Sachs have revised their forecasts, suggesting that a cooling labor market and the easing of tariff impacts might create conditions for Fed easing. However, some analysts argue there is still no decisive evidence of inflation retreating, and hasty actions could lead to destabilized expectations.

Wall Street Split, Caution and Aggressiveness Coexist

Within investment firms, diverging views on monetary policy outlooks are becoming increasingly apparent. Some institutions prefer to anticipate risks and advocate for pre-emptive measures against weakening economic momentum, while others stress patient observation of price indices, suggesting a "wait and see" approach.

Certain strategists warn that the current stock market performance is detached from the inflation path, and the optimistic market sentiment may be masking underlying macroeconomic instabilities. Especially with the complex global trade situation and fluctuating tariff policies, the Fed's operational window is particularly narrow.

Diverse Opinions Among Fed Officials, Mixed Internal Signals

According to the latest meeting minutes, there is a clear divide among Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members on rate cuts. Some officials advocate closely monitoring changes in market expectations and responding swiftly if necessary, while others insist on continuing to observe data to avoid premature actions that could lead to uncertain responses.

Notably, officials who initially favored early action have adopted a more cautious stance following recent new tariff proposals, indicating that even within the dovish camp there are concerns about inflation potentially rising again.

Ongoing Pressure from Trump, Policy Independence Tested Again

External political factors are exerting additional pressure on Fed decisions. President Trump has repeatedly publicly pressured for rate cuts to ease financial burdens on businesses and citizens and has often questioned the current policy's tightness. However, Fed leadership continues to uphold policy autonomy, resisting using monetary tools as political leverage.

Analysts note that if the Fed accelerates rate cuts under external pressure, it could lead to market doubts about its independence, which would be detrimental to the stability expectations of the U.S. financial markets in the long term.

Weak Real Estate Market May Become a Policy Breakthrough

While inflation and tariffs dominate policy debates, the weakness in the real estate sector might also prompt Fed policy adjustments. Some strategists suggest that past U.S. economic recoveries are closely linked to real estate rallies, making real estate stimulation a key indicator in rate cut decisions.

If rate adjustments can alleviate mortgage costs, it could stimulate home-buying demand, thereby revitalizing related industry chains and injecting momentum into the broader economic recovery.

Policy Path Still Dependent on Data Evolution

Despite mounting market calls, the timing of rate cuts must remain anchored to data. Upcoming months' critical employment data, CPI, and PCE performances will serve as policy guides. Amidst the intertwined political and economic variables, the Fed needs to strike a delicate balance between controlling inflation and avoiding recession.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.