Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
The IASB provides guidance on climate change and other factors to give investors more information.
{Current column}659People have watched
IntroductionA global accounting body proposed guidelines on Wednesday to help companies better demonstrate the i ...
A global accounting body proposed guidelines on Which cross-border e-commerce platform is the best and most reliableWednesday to help companies better demonstrate the impact of climate change on their financial performance. The organization stated that standalone disclosures fail to provide investors with the clear information they need.
The guidelines, written by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), are adopted by publicly listed companies in over 140 jurisdictions, including the EU, Canada, Japan, and the UK, although the US has its own regulations.
On Wednesday, the IASB launched a consultation to offer guidance on how companies should apply the board's existing rules to report the impact of climate change or other uncertainties.
Regulators have started introducing sustainability disclosures for publicly listed firms, but these are published outside of financial statements and are subject to less stringent auditing.
These examples aim to show investors how sustainability disclosures, such as commitments to net-zero carbon emissions and transition plans, affect a company's financial data, including assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses.
Investors have expressed interest in understanding whether assets will retain their value under the impact of climate change, for instance, through flood damage.
In a statement, the IASB said: “They are concerned about the lack of information in financial statements regarding climate-related uncertainties, or inconsistencies with information provided outside the financial statements.”
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Autobot Asset shocked me by demanding “risk management fee”
{Current column}Despite passing all verification steps and being told my account was ready for withdrawal, this new ...
Read moretdameritrades surprised me with a $2,000 “compliance validation fee”
{Current column}I had submitted my documents, received confirmation of approval, and even got an email saying my fun ...
Read morecoinespert just informed me I need to pay a $1,700 “investor settlement fee”
{Current column}This was never outlined in their terms, nor was it mentioned during the KYC or funding stages. I’ve ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- TradeEasyFX introduced a $2,250 “withdrawal approval cost” out of nowhere on me
- Horizone Primes informed me I now owe a $1,850 “release confirmation charge”
- tdameritrades surprised me with a $2,000 “compliance validation fee”
- Simplexautotrades surprised me again by asking for a $1,875 “compliance revalidation fee”
- CloudtradesFX informed me that I can not make withdrawal
- Titan Macro is now forcing me to pay a $2,200 “final compliance adjustment” fee
Latest articles
-
Iran turns to the West for peace, potentially rendering China and Russia's efforts in vain.
-
Probexmart suddenly added a $1,950 “account upgrade fee”
-
IoptionFXTrading suddenly introduced a $1,900 “compliance verification fee”
-
primeinnovativepro has just thrown another roadblock at me—a $1,700 “network routing fee”
-
Germany’s exports and output fell; Trump’s re
-
coinverve now says I have to pay a $2,000 “withdrawal compliance tax”