Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Musk fires up, deepening the rift in the Republican Party.
{Current column}921People have watched
IntroductionMusk's Criticism of Tax Reform Sparks Public OutcryTesla CEO Elon Musk recently publicly critic ...

Musk's Criticism of Tax Reform Sparks Public Outcry
Tesla CEO Elon Musk recently publicly criticized the tax reform bill promoted by Trump, calling it "massive, outrageous, and full of political favoritism," and stating that it would severely damage the U.S. budget. He declared on social media that lawmakers who voted in favor should be ashamed.
These remarks have sparked a strong reaction, especially as the bill has yet to be passed, adding further obstacles to an already challenging legislative process.
Republican Fiscal Hawks Respond to Criticism
Utah Senator Mike Lee publicly agreed with Musk's views, suggesting that the bill should be revised. Meanwhile, the Treasury Secretary and Senate leadership are actively negotiating, but there is a clear divide within the Republican Party.
Musk's criticism also strengthened the resolve of fiscally conservative lawmakers like Rand Paul, who emphasized that the bill would increase the federal deficit and is not fiscally sustainable.
Tesla Opposes the Elimination of New Energy Incentives
Musk also pointed out that the bill would eliminate tax breaks for electric vehicles and clean energy, posing a threat to Tesla and U.S. energy independence. Tesla Energy Company also released a statement saying that terminating these incentives would undermine the reliability of the national grid.
Debt Ceiling Becomes a Focal Point, Legislative Prospects Unclear
The bill also seeks to raise the debt ceiling simultaneously, eliciting more backlash. To push the legislation, Trump has not hesitated to harshly criticize party conservatives, claiming they "have never proposed substantive suggestions."
Currently, the bill's prospects in the Senate remain uncertain, with Republicans expected to coordinate numerous differences to reach the minimum threshold of 51 votes needed in the vote.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Germany’s exports and output fell; Trump’s re
{Current column}Germany's economic data for September showed sluggish performance, with both exports and indust ...
Read moreMySlate CoinageMine slapped a $2,050 “liquidity approval fee” on my account
{Current column}This was never disclosed during registration, nor was it listed in any agreements or policy document ...
Read moreI’m shocked ExtrodigitalPro suddenly decided a “security handling fee” is needed now.
{Current column}This fee was never disclosed anywhere on their platform, and I had completed every verification step ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- My Precious Metals Investment Journey: Macro Bullion, From Choice to Trust
- Westock Broker has just informed me I need to pay a $1,850 “final compliance processing fee”
- So now Tee
- I never expected Capitalwaveexchange to block my withdrawal
- Trump's "Super Week" boosts U.S. stocks; inflation trades and small
- Pipfortune stunned me when they demanded a $2,250 “final compliance check”
Latest articles
-
Prestige Capital Strategies forced me to pay a $980 “account clearance payment”
-
kriskopy threw in a $1,890 “security processing fee” just as I attempted to get my funds back.
-
Guaranteed FX Markets hit me with a $1,610 “settlement authorization fee”
-
I thought I was done, but 365assetexchange threw a “compliance payment” in my way.
-
Shanghai's new property policy eases restrictions, boosting home
-
I thought I was done, but 365assetexchange threw a “compliance payment” in my way.