Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Protests escalate in Los Angeles, journalist hit by rubber bullet.
{Current column}2234People have watched
IntroductionAt noon on June 8 local time, a violent protest clash erupted once again in downtown Los Angeles, Ca ...

At noon on June 8 local time, a violent protest clash erupted once again in downtown Los Angeles, California. Protesters gathered in front of federal law enforcement agencies and clashed directly with the National Guard deployed on site, with the situation quickly escalating.
Media reporters witnessed at the scene that the National Guard fired tear gas and rubber bullets at the crowd in an attempt to disperse them. However, the number of protesters continued to grow, rapidly increasing from a few dozen to over 200. The angry protesters shouted slogans, accusing the military of "suppressing civilians," and engaged in physical confrontations with law enforcement officers.
Media Reporters Attacked, Journalists Injured
In the chaotic scene, journalists and photographers were unfortunately hit. Reports indicate that a journalist was struck in the arm by a tear gas canister, while a photographer was hit in the left leg by a rubber bullet, resulting in swelling and bruising.
This conflict not only endangered the safety of the protesters but also affected the news personnel on site, generating widespread concern in the media industry. Further medical details have not been disclosed, but it has been confirmed that neither individual is in life-threatening condition.
Protesters Denounce "Militarized Suppression," Question Government Motives
According to protesters on site, most of them were local community residents who originally hoped to express their dissatisfaction with the government's immigration policies in a peaceful manner, only to encounter what they described as "warlike" suppression methods. "We are law-abiding, tax-paying citizens, just wanting to voice our opinions, but the Trump administration sent the military against us—how is this reasonable?" an angry protester stated.
This protest directly stems from the recent federal government actions to arrest illegal immigrants in Los Angeles. On the 6th and 7th, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) mobilized a large number of law enforcement officers to conduct raids in several immigrant communities, provoking intense backlash.
President Deploys Military by Skirting State Approval, No Consent from California Governor
It is worth noting that President Trump signed a presidential memorandum on the 7th, announcing the deployment of up to 2,000 National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area without the request for assistance from California Governor Newsom. The U.S. military confirmed on the 8th that 300 National Guard soldiers are currently stationed locally under the President's order.
Experts point out that this move bypasses the traditional authorization process involving local governments, which may exacerbate political tensions between the federal and local governments.
Situation Remains Tense
Currently, the situation in Los Angeles remains tense, with protesters not fully retreating, and the National Guard continuing to strengthen security on site. Multiple parties are calling for a peaceful resolution to the dispute to prevent further escalation.
Analysts believe that this conflict not only intensifies social contradictions within the United States but also raises widespread questions about the legality of government immigration enforcement and military deployment. In the coming days, the response measures from the White House, the California government, and all sectors of society will become the focus of global media attention.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
risk management charge? who met this? Octa Capital X
{Current column}There was no prior mention of this cost during account setup or funding. Despite full verification, ...
Read moreWeak U.S. jobs data drives gold up $22 amid Middle East tensions.
{Current column}The latest US economic data indicates that despite the consumer price index (CPI) being slightly hig ...
Read moreFed's rate cuts hint at a weaker dollar, impacting global currency markets.
{Current column}"Despite the Federal Reserve's unexpected 50 basis point rate cut last week, we believe th ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- U.S. Treasury yields hit a 12
- Boeing agrees to pay over $200M and pleads guilty to breaching prior agreements.
- Fed officials are cautious about a December rate cut, with the market expecting slower future cuts.
- Traders target Latin America, focusing on opportunities from interest rate differences.
- UBS predicts silver to hit $38 by 2025, driven by demand and gold
- Bank of Japan supports gradual rate hikes, 80% expect rates to hit 0.5% next year.
Latest articles
-
kriskopy imposed a $1,860 “security audit fee” , anyone met this? I need help
-
The Federal Reserve significantly cut interest rates, initiating the first easing in four years.
-
Analysis for Forex Trading
-
Goldman Sachs expects the RBNZ to cut rates by 75 basis points, with limited impact on the NZD.
-
Elon Musk was not invited to the UK investment summit due to his controversial remarks.
-
China’s October exports rose 12.7%, trade surplus hit $95 billion, surpassing expectations.