Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
South Korean President Yoon faces impeachment and arrest turmoil, deepening division and crisis.
{Current column}681People have watched
IntroductionOn January 5, the impeachment and arrest turmoil faced by South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol conti ...

On January 5, the impeachment and arrest turmoil faced by South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol continued to intensify, further escalating domestic political tensions. Although the Seoul Western District Court rejected Yoon's objection to the arrest warrant, the Public Investigation Office did not attempt to re-enforce the arrest warrant that day. This unprecedented political crisis has exposed deep divisions and turmoil within South Korea.
Arrest Turmoil and Legal Struggles
In December of last year, the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) requested an arrest warrant for Yoon Suk-yeol on charges of attempting to instigate rebellion and abuse of power. Although the Seoul Western District Court approved the arrest warrant on December 31, the attempt by the CIO, in conjunction with police and military, to arrest Yoon at the presidential residence on January 3 faced strong resistance, leading to the operation being aborted. A barrier formed by the Presidential Security Service and military police effectively thwarted the arrest effort.
On January 5, Yoon's defense lawyer announced they would consider appealing to the Supreme Court, arguing that the issuance of the arrest warrant violated laws and the constitution. Additionally, the legal team plans to report over 150 related personnel, including the CIO director, to the Seoul prosecutor's office, accusing them of damaging military facilities and executing illegal arrests.
Impeachment Trial and Political Division
Meanwhile, the impeachment case against Yoon Suk-yeol is being heard by the Constitutional Court. If Yoon appears at the first trial on January 14, he will become the first incumbent president in South Korean history to personally attend an impeachment trial. Yoon's legal team argues that the National Assembly's passing of the impeachment and recommending judges was improper, emphasizing the lack of legitimacy in the impeachment trial.
South Korea's ruling and opposition parties are locked in fierce debate over the issue. The ruling party suggests that if the core reasons for impeachment are revoked, the National Assembly should re-vote. The opposition demands immediate enforcement of the arrest warrant and increased pressure on the ruling party.
Social Division and International Impact
Near the presidential residence, gatherings continue as supporters and opponents of Yoon Suk-yeol chant slogans, heightening tensions. Korean media commentary suggests the crisis is exacerbating societal divisions. The Chosun Ilbo comments that the attempt to arrest a sitting president has led to institutional conflicts, damaging South Korea's international reputation. Yoon Suk-yeol has failed to promote national unity and instead heightened societal antagonism.
France's Le Monde analyzes that South Korea's political environment in recent years has been dominated by revenge against opponents, with the pandemic and inequality deepening societal divisions. The UK's Sunday Times also notes that despite South Korea's global recognition in popular culture, domestic political divisions are tearing society apart, creating uncertainty for the future.
Future Challenges and Uncertainty
With the arrest warrant set to expire on January 6, it remains to be seen whether the CIO will attempt another arrest. Meanwhile, developments in the Constitutional Court trial will decide Yoon's political fate. Regardless of the outcome, this crisis has deeply impacted South Korea's political ecosystem, posing an undeniable challenge to national stability and international image. In the future, bridging societal divides and restoring national unity will be major challenges for South Korea.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Iran turns to the West for peace, potentially rendering China and Russia's efforts in vain.
{Current column}Recently, Iran announced its wish to negotiate with Western countries to peacefully resolve tensions ...
Read moreLivefinance247 is asking for a “payment gateway fee” before processing my withdrawal.
{Current column}They told me that in order to finalize my withdrawal of $2,500, I need to pay a $1,000 “payment gate ...
Read moreRise Trade said my account is “under review,” they want me to pay a $1,000 fee for further process
{Current column}After requesting a withdrawal, they told me my account is “under review” due to some alleged inconsi ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- The Brazilian government advances spending controls to stabilize finances and ease budget pressure.
- IBTP informed me today that there’s a $1,700 "equity settlement fee"
- Bitminerix told me I need to pay an ‘account withdrawal fee’ before I can access my funds.
- PhemaxCryptotrade told me that I need to pay a $1,700 “final approval charge”
- ZenithTrustCorp hit me with a $1,850 “security inspection payment” just as I tried to withdraw.
- Volta Fx asked for a ‘transaction approval fee’ to process my withdrawal.
Latest articles
-
Oil giants fear Middle East conflict, expect rising demand, adding energy transition pressure.
-
UnlimitedTradeFX askedme to pay a $2,300 to release my withdrawal funds.
-
TQX Global is asking for a “transaction confirmation fee” before processing my withdrawal.
-
TradeChain Crypto said I need to provide a “profit statement fee” to withdraw. Is this a scam?
-
SilverFx24Option unexpectedly demanded a $1,900 “final payout clearance fee”
-
I’ve been trying to withdraw my funds for weeks now. Sterlinglobemark keeps saying there’s a delay.