Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
The Trump administration requests the removal of the credit card late fee cap.
{Current column}647People have watched
IntroductionOn April 14, the Trump administration requested the federal court to revoke the new regulations set ...
On April 14,Spread the Trump administration requested the federal court to revoke the new regulations set by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) regarding credit card late fee caps. The government aligned with the business and banking groups that, in a lawsuit, argued the regulation violated the law. According to these regulations, the fee cap for late payments is set at $8, unless the card issuer can prove it necessary to charge a higher fee to cover costs.
The Trump administration, alongside the business groups involved in the lawsuit, filed documents with the federal court in Texas, requesting Fort Worth Federal District Judge Mark Pittman to make a final ruling terminating the late fee regulation. Judge Pittman had previously blocked the CFPB from implementing this regulation, which is part of Democratic President Biden's initiative to combat "junk fees."
The Trump administration had previously attempted to dissolve the CFPB but was partially blocked by the courts. A federal appeals court ruled that the government could reduce the staff of the CFPB but could not completely eliminate the agency. Since its inception, the CFPB has faced criticism from Republicans, accusing it of lacking accountability and overstepping its powers through enforcement actions against financial companies.
According to the original CFPB regulation, card issuers with over one million active accounts could not charge more than $8 in late fees unless they could demonstrate that higher fees were necessary to cover actual costs. Last December, Judge Pittman ruled that this regulation violated the 2009 Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act, which limits excessive fees but allows card issuers to charge "penalty" fees when customers breach credit card agreements.
This lawsuit and the Trump administration's involvement signify a further escalation in the dispute over CFPB's regulatory power and fee regulations.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Iran turns to the West for peace, potentially rendering China and Russia's efforts in vain.
{Current column}Recently, Iran announced its wish to negotiate with Western countries to peacefully resolve tensions ...
Read morereliabletradefx now insists that a $1,930 “portfolio finalization fee”
{Current column}I’ve never seen this term before—not in the FAQ, not in their terms, not from their agents until tod ...
Read moreTradeEasyFX is refusing to release my funds unless I pay a $1,870 “internal risk compliance fee”
{Current column}That term doesn’t even sound real. I’ve never seen it on their site or in any agreement. They’re cle ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- risk management charge? who met this? Octa Capital X
- Igenuis Trade just informed me that I need to pay a $1,920 “final settlement charge”
- TM9 just sent me a request for a $1,950 “global remittance fee”
- 1FXT is demanding a $1,880 “compliance synchronization fee” for my withdrawal
- Gold experiences volatility while waiting for CPI; Intraday gold trading analysis strategy.
- Fast Pips Tech Analysis suddenly claimed I need to pay a $2,150 “global clearance charge”
Latest articles
-
Bezes Unveils New Website Version
-
Sterlinglobemark blindsided me with a $1,700 “international verification fee” that I never agreed to
-
Zen TradingsFX claims I owe a $1,640 "fund release authorization charge"
-
CelloBase Capital Ltd blocked my withdrawal again—this time, they want $2,200
-
Bezes Unveils New Website Version
-
Universal Markets Trades hit me with a $1,890 “fund security verification fee”