Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Japan plans to stick to annual budget policy next fiscal year, striving to eliminate inflation.
{Current column}32People have watched
IntroductionJapan plans to stick to its goal of achieving a primary budget surplus in the next fiscal year, acco ...
Japan plans to stick to its goal of achieving a primary budget surplus in the next fiscal year,Is Haihui International a formal platform? according to a draft of its annual budget planning policy guidelines.
The draft also states that the government will continue efforts to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio.
According to government projections in January, assuming continued strong economic growth and ongoing spending cut measures, the world's fourth-largest economy is expected to achieve a primary budget surplus in fiscal 2025.
Japan's primary budget balance (excluding new bond sales and debt servicing costs) has been in deficit for most of the post-war period, with the exception of the asset bubble period from 1986 to 1991.
As a result, Japan currently has the most severe public debt among industrialized nations, exceeding twice the size of its economy. Japan first set the goal of achieving a primary budget surplus in the early 2000s, but the target date has been postponed multiple times.
The draft notes, "Japan now faces an unprecedented opportunity to completely overcome deflation and achieve growth. We need to move forward to realize economic recovery and fiscal health."
However, the draft also mentions that achieving the primary budget surplus should not mean that the government is deprived of key policy options in certain economic situations.
The draft emphasizes that the government needs to work closely with the central bank and "flexibly" guide policy to achieve sustainable economic growth driven by private sector demand.
The draft also notes, "Monetary policy has entered a new phase," pointing out that the Bank of Japan ended eight years of negative interest rate policy in March.
The government draft will be submitted for review by ruling party lawmakers before the cabinet meeting on June 21.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
GlobeInvestFX required me to pay a $980 account clearance payment
{Current column}This cost was never disclosed during signup or verification. Despite completing all procedures, this ...
Read moreJareth Mun develops QT Capital's AI investment strategy in Asia.
{Current column}In 2017, Jareth Mun returned to Asia with a clear mission: to build an investment management firm th ...
Read more“withdrawal security fee” on me? Why? who knows Sterlinglobaltrade
{Current column}I completed all required KYC and was approved weeks ago. This unexpected fee appeared only when I tr ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Prestige Capital Strategies forced me to pay a $980 “account clearance payment”
- Tycoon Online Limited announced a $2,050 “withdrawal clearance cost” that was never mentioned before
- Taylor Wimpey warns that rising interest rates will impact the housing market.
- Fortunetact surprised me with a $2,000 “ledger synchronization fee”
- Huawei HarmonyOS Night scheduled, Mate 70 mass
- ZHOTXPRIMETRADE told me I need pay $2,050 “risk assessment charge”
Latest articles
-
My Precious Metals Investment Journey: Macro Bullion, From Choice to Trust
-
Global147expertfx demanded a $2,150 “final transaction fee” before processing my withdrawal
-
When I tried to withdraw, Coinlivetech hit me with $1,100 “final payout charge.”
-
Nancy Pelosi's husband lost nearly a million dollars trading options.
-
Iran may attack Israel, raising Middle East tensions and oil price fluctuations.
-
Zenith TradesIQ hit me with a $920 “liquidity release charge”