Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Rising rent pressures low
{Current column}247People have watched
IntroductionThe latest study by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) shows that low-income household ...
The Is short-term foreign exchange trading real or fakelatest study by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) shows that low-income households in Germany are under increasing pressure due to rising rents, especially single-parent families and individuals living alone. These groups spend a much higher proportion of their income on rent compared to wealthy families, further exacerbating their financial burden. The data indicates that in 2021, the lowest 20% income group spent on average more than a third of their income on rent, while the wealthiest group spent only a fifth.
Over the past decade, rent prices across Germany have risen by 50%, with this increase reaching 70% in major cities. Despite the German government's goal to build 400,000 apartments annually to combat the housing shortage, the actual number of constructions falls short. In 2022, only 294,400 apartments were completed in Germany.
Additionally, the proportion of income spent on housing continues to rise, with the number of households spending more than 40% of their income on rent increasing from 5% to 14%. Nonetheless, demand for real estate has not declined despite rising interest rates and construction costs, and pressure on the rental market persists.
The Berlin city government implemented a rent cap policy in 2020, yet rents in the capital continue to climb, having increased by 40% over seven years. However, this policy has been deemed unconstitutional by Germany's highest court. The DIW study suggests providing targeted economic support for low-income groups and vigorously promoting social housing construction to alleviate the current rental market crisis.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
New accounts at FOREX.com can receive up to $5000 in bonuses.
{Current column}Customers who successfully open a new unsponsored account for the first time can receive correspondi ...
Read moreCelloBase Capital Ltd blocked my withdrawal again—this time, they want $2,200
{Current column}I’ve never even seen this term on any financial site. I asked for a receipt or legal explanation, an ...
Read moreProtrade Options suddenly told me I must pay a $1,600 “release authorization fee”
{Current column}I was shocked—there was no warning, no prior mention of such a fee. I had been trading for weeks wit ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- TrustVest Capital required me a $2,000 “risk management surcharge”
- Prolifics Market just told me I need to cover a $1,850 “cross
- CelloBase Capital Ltd is now telling me I have to pay a $1,700 “exit transaction fee”
- Fexsi now says I must pay a $1,960 “international verification fee”
- CrypticBitFx informed me I need to pay a “withdrawal processing fee”
- Igenuis Trade just informed me that I need to pay a $1,920 “final settlement charge”
Latest articles
-
In early trading, the three major central banks discuss rates. Short
-
HEZBIT has added a $1,720 “backend synchronization charge” to my withdrawal process
-
Pim Crest Market just emailed me demanding a $2,000 "risk management verification fee"
-
EchoSphe said I owe a $1,800 “account release fee” that they failed to disclose at any earlier stage
-
OffizielleKryptoBorse blocked my $2,100 withdrawal
-
CloudtradesFX emailed me this morning requiring a $890 “cross