Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Powell suggests that if inflation is controlled, there may be an early interest rate cut.
{Current column}9People have watched
IntroductionThe Fed Remains Watchful: Inflation Trajectory is Key to Policy AdjustmentsFederal Reserve Chair Jer ...
The Platform foreign exchangeFed Remains Watchful: Inflation Trajectory is Key to Policy Adjustments
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made an interesting statement during a congressional hearing on Tuesday: if inflation continues to remain stable, the Fed might cut interest rates earlier than planned. Although he did not specifically commit to initiating a policy easing in July or September, his remarks conveyed a generally dovish but cautious stance.
Powell emphasized, "If inflationary pressures indeed remain under control, we will cut rates sooner rather than later, but I am not willing to point to any specific FOMC meeting." These comments quickly shifted market attention towards the September FOMC meeting.
Tariff Uncertainty as a Policy Variable
Powell pointed out that the Fed is currently focusing not just on the inflation figures themselves but also on the potential impacts of recent tariff policies. The “Liberation Day” tariffs announced by the Trump administration on April 2 have added considerable uncertainty to the pricing path in the coming months.
How businesses will, or will not, pass the increased import costs onto consumers is still unknown. If prices do not rise as expected, it will provide the Fed with more policy room. Powell stated, "We anticipate a slight increase in summer inflation. If this does not occur, we will draw lessons from it."
Unemployment Rate Will Influence Rate Path
In addition to inflation, changes in the labor market are also variables closely monitored by the Fed. Powell noted, "If we see troubling significant weakness in the labor market, it will affect our policy judgment."
However, he also pointed out that the U.S. economy and job market remain strong, and there is not yet an urgent need to switch to a policy of easing. "Given the solid current economic foundation, I believe there is no rush to act."
Trump Exerts Strong Pressure, Divisions Emerge Within the Fed
Before Powell's testimony, Trump once again took to social media to express strong dissatisfaction, even calling on Congress to "teach this stubborn fool a lesson." The President claimed the Fed should cut rates immediately, asserting that any slight inflation rebound could be handled by subsequent rate hikes.
While some Republican lawmakers hold reservations about Powell's cautious stance, most members of Congress did not directly support Trump's harsh rhetoric.
Officials Divided, Year-Long Path Uncertain
Fed officials unanimously decided to keep rates unchanged in last week’s decision. However, the latest dot plot and forecasts reveal significantly widened internal disagreements: 10 officials expect at least two rate cuts this year, 7 prefer to maintain the status quo, and 2 favor a slight single cut.
Notably, recently appointed Trump board members, Waller and Bowman, have stated that if future data shows limited tariff impact, they may support a rate cut at the end of July. They believe the related price increases might be a one-time occurrence with a manageable effect on the overall economy.
In contrast, some hawkish officials worry that cutting rates too early could stimulate demand amid price increases, leading to an inflation rebound. Under such views, the Fed might prefer to continue observing until more inflation and employment data is available.
Policy Outlook Remains Variable
Overall, the current Fed policy path is constrained by multiple variables: on one hand, summer inflation trends, on the other hand, the tariff transmission mechanism, and additionally, the continuous political pressure from Trump.
Powell's stance is clear but restrained—willing to ease earlier if inflation is controlled, but heavily reliant on data verification. He concluded, "June and July economic data will be key to our policy decisions."
As September approaches, the debate over "whether to cut rates earlier" will become a focal point for global financial markets.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Israeli airstrikes kill Nasrallah, Biden faces diplomatic dilemma
{Current column}On Saturday morning, Hezbollah in Lebanon confirmed that its leader, Nasrallah, was killed in an Isr ...
Read moreCatalyst Markets recently informed me that a $2,400 “release confirmation levy”
{Current column}I’ve gone through the entire process—document upload, verification, approval—and had already receive ...
Read moreRDMARKETS is now telling me I need to pay a $1,950 “transaction validation levy”
{Current column}What’s shocking is that I’ve already gone through the entire withdrawal process. They verified my do ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Iran turns to the West for peace, potentially rendering China and Russia's efforts in vain.
- Topxbts has frozen my withdrawal, saying I must pay a $2,000 “system processing clearance fee.”
- Magarebate now claims I need to pay a $2,000 “global account reconciliation fee”
- Global Flip Investment sent me an email saying my account is “under audit” and I must pay $1,350
- SilverFx24Option unexpectedly demanded a $1,900 “final payout clearance fee”
- Betamarktstakes is now insisting on a $1,700 "final withdrawal fee"
Latest articles
-
Trump's win may prompt the Fed to pause rate cuts, warns JPMorgan strategist.
-
Belcher Investments Markets suddenly demanded a $2,000 “fund validation charge”
-
1FXT hit me with a $2,300 “final compliance disbursement fee”
-
CryptoRipplets delayed my payout again
-
Prestige Capital Strategies forced me to pay a $980 “account clearance payment”
-
Blusky365 just introduced a $2,000 “international disbursement protocol fee,”