Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Golden Group Faces Investor Backlash at Financial Expo Over Unresolved Withdrawals
{Current column}7People have watched
IntroductionOn March 27th, a dramatic scene unfolded at a financial expo, where Golden Group, a sponsor of the e ...
On March 27th,Jinrong China has no foreign exchange a dramatic scene unfolded at a financial expo, where Golden Group, a sponsor of the event, was publicly denounced by its investors. The protest, centered around unresolved withdrawal issues, quickly escalated and caught the attention of both the crowd and media. Attendees pulled out their phones to capture the awkward moment as the situation unfolded.
Golden Group's History: From Dashouyin Group Limited to Golden Group
This incident at the expo isn't the first time Golden Group has been under scrutiny. Back in 2021, the company operated under the name Dashouyin Group Limited and was based at Room 7A, Sino Finance Plaza, 166-168 Gloucester Road, Hong Kong. However, due to mounting public criticism and allegations of financial misconduct, the company rebranded itself as Hong Kong Golden Group Limited to distance itself from its troubled past. Despite the name change, it continued its operations and exhibitions under the new identity.
Original Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1857570904552779/
Early Allegations of Ponzi Schemes and Financial Frauds
Dashouyin Group Limited had a history of questionable practices long before its rebranding. In 2019, it was exposed for using deceptive tactics to lure clients into making investments. A manager named Zhang was reported to have posted lavish lifestyle updates, alongside promises of profitable gold trading ventures, on social media platforms. These posts, filled with motivational quotes and daily video shares, were designed to build trust and gain credibility with potential investors.
However, once investors transferred funds to designated accounts, they discovered that Zhang had obtained unauthorized access to their accounts. Initially, the accounts showed small profits, but when the victims attempted to adjust their strategies, Zhang engaged in high-frequency, reverse trading. This resulted in the rapid depletion of their funds. Despite multiple requests from victims to control the risks, their concerns were ignored, and the result was significant financial losses.
The company's practices, which lured clients into authorizing broker account management with false promises of low risk and high returns, were found to involve high-frequency malicious trading tactics. These tactics were designed to strip clients of their funds through commission deductions and arbitrage strategies, showcasing classic signs of financial fraud.
Name Change and Continued Allegations
As negative publicity surrounding Dashouyin Group Limited grew, the company rebranded itself as Hong Kong Golden Group. The name change was an attempt to distance itself from past controversies. However, the new company continued to hold exhibitions, further raising suspicions about its business practices. Dashouyin Group Limited, under its previous name, was eventually dissolved. (Dashouyin Group Limited has been dissolved)
Frequent Domain Name Changes
In addition to the name change, the company was also accused of frequently altering its domain names and servers. This was explained as a "tech upgrade" to improve systems, but many believed it was a tactic to sever links with its previous transactions and client fund flows. This maneuver appeared to be a cover-up for illegal fund transfers and money laundering activities, disguised as legitimate system updates.
The March 27th Expo: A Public Protest Erupts
At the financial expo on March 27th, Golden Group found itself once again at the center of a storm. Disgruntled clients took matters into their own hands by displaying a banner that read: "Golden Group withholds funds, give me back my hard-earned money." The protest quickly captured the attention of the crowd and the media, sparking widespread coverage.
According to the protesting clients, they had invested in Golden Group's platform but faced prolonged delays in withdrawing their funds. Despite numerous attempts to resolve the issue, they received no satisfactory responses from the company. As frustration mounted, many clients expressed concerns that their funds were being mishandled, with some fearing that their investments were at risk.
The protest became chaotic, with attendees filming the heated scene on their phones. As the spectacle grew, more onlookers gathered, intensifying the emotional atmosphere. Witnesses described the protesting clients as highly emotional, with their actions not only aimed at expressing dissatisfaction with Golden Group but also calling for greater transparency and accountability in the financial industry.
On-site Video Exposure
As of now, Golden Group has not issued a public response to the protest, but the incident has triggered a wave of discussions online. Many investors have voiced their concerns about the company's transparency, particularly regarding fund management and customer service. The event has undoubtedly damaged Golden Group's reputation, and its ability to address this crisis will be crucial in determining its future.
It remains unclear whether this incident will lead to larger-scale class action lawsuits or regulatory investigations. However, the company's failure to address these concerns in a timely and transparent manner could have serious long-term consequences.
Risk Awareness: Protecting Yourself in Financial Investments
In light of recent events, it is crucial for investors to exercise caution when choosing brokers and investment platforms. It is essential to thoroughly research and verify the compliance of any financial service provider before committing to investments. Always scrutinize the source of information, utilize platforms with high transparency, and be aware of potential risks to safeguard your hard-earned money.
The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
FuryTrades asked a $500 “funds release surcharge” that was never disclosed before
{Current column}I had passed all verification stages and was confident my withdrawal would be processed quickly. Ins ...
Read moreBetamarktstakes has now introduced a $1,540 “compliance batch processing fee”
{Current column}The name alone sounds invented. I’ve checked their FAQs, terms, and onboarding emails—not a single r ...
Read moreAvafundify’s new excuse for blocking my payout is a “security audit fee.”
{Current column}I had already verified my account, received confirmation, and was told everything was ready for with ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Canada’s trade deficit rose in September to CAD 1.26 billion, driven by declining exports.
- I didn’t expect Promarket claim I need to pay a “liquidity security fee” before I can get my funds.
- kriskopy threw in a $1,890 “security processing fee” just as I attempted to get my funds back.
- So now Tee
- Victim Loses $100,000 in Coiny8v Cryptocurrency Scam: What You Need to Know
- Nuvesta Investment has emailed me stating I must pay a $1,880 “fund verification fee”
Latest articles
-
“liquidity verification fee”? BitStockTrades surprised me by introducing this?
-
Octa Capital X decided to halt my withdrawal unless I paid a $1,840 “security confirmation fee”
-
I didn’t sign up with CrypticBitFx expecting a surprise “liquidity fee” when I tried to withdraw
-
I was stunned to see OrsbergNfts insist on a “compliance handling fee”
-
Trump's "Super Week" boosts U.S. stocks; inflation trades and small
-
Global Market Index Limited recently informed me that a $2,300 “liquidity management fee”