Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
I’m sorry, but I cannot fulfill this request. Let me know if you need help with anything else!
{Current column}872People have watched
IntroductionThe latest poll shows strong Canadian public support for imposing an export tax on oil as a retaliat ...

The latest poll shows strong Canadian public support for imposing an export tax on oil as a retaliatory measure against President Donald Trump's tariff hikes, following the fluctuations caused by Trump's tariff policies. This support indicates the anger of Canadians towards Trump's policies and may push the Canadian government to take a firmer stance against Trump's threats in the future.
On the 1st of this month, Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25% tariff on Canadian goods, with the sole exception of energy products, which had a tariff rate of 10%. In response, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau quickly announced retaliatory measures. However, before these tariff policies took effect, Trump declared that due to Canada's agreement to take measures ensuring U.S. border security, the imposition of tariffs on Canada would be delayed by 30 days.
According to the latest poll by Nanos Research Group, 82% of Canadians support unilaterally raising the price of oil exported to the U.S. when Trump imposes tariffs on Canada but exempts oil. This strong support reflects Canadians' willingness to use oil as a countermeasure to Trump's tariff policies, even if this move could negatively impact their own economy.
Further analysis shows that in Canada's western prairie provinces, 72% of residents support this measure. This region includes Alberta, Canada's main oil-producing province. Despite Alberta Premier Daniel Smith's refusal last month to sign a Canadian leaders' joint statement, which did not rule out restricting energy exports, Canadians seem to be in favor of an oil export tax.
In the four Atlantic coastal provinces, 90% of respondents support adopting retaliatory oil policies, and these regions also have offshore oil projects. When asked if they support additional tariffs on imported U.S. goods, 79% of Canadians expressed support, even if it means paying higher prices for goods.
For Canada-U.S. trade, oil remains Canada's most potent countermeasure. Despite the appearance of large U.S. crude oil capacity, much of it is light crude, requiring heavy crude imports from Canada to produce diesel and aviation fuel. Due to the shared border and low transportation costs, and given that the energy supply chain is deeply integrated into the U.S. economy, the U.S. relies on Canada for about 4 million barrels of crude oil annually, accounting for 60% of its net imports.
If Canada implements a retaliatory oil policy, analysts predict that drivers in the Great Lakes and Midwest regions of the U.S. might see gasoline prices rise by 20 cents per gallon. Combined with routine refinery maintenance and seasonal demand pressures, gasoline prices are expected to increase from the current $3 per gallon to around $4.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
[Early Trade] Slight Cooling in Demand, Gold Prices Continue to Fluctuate
{Current column}Gold:The World Gold Council stated on Tuesday (July 30) that global gold demand, excluding over-the- ...
Read moreAVA Global is now demanding that I pay a $1,800 “regulatory review fee”
{Current column}I’ve already gone through the entire verification process, and my account was approved weeks ago. Su ...
Read moreDeChoiceXpress is now asking me to pay a $2,300 "transaction settlement fee"
{Current column}This is the latest surprise fee they’ve introduced, and it wasn’t mentioned when I registered. I’ve ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- U.S. election and China policy shifts spur copper price fluctuations.
- I was informed by Axmarketsignal that a $1,600 “cross
- Bittechub is now demanding a $1,950 “transaction completion fee” to finalize my withdrawal.
- BitPayfx has presented me with a $1,650 “funds integrity evaluation fee”
- U.S. September CPI beats expectations, may impact Fed policy.
- Htpftrading has informed me that a $1,900 “withdrawal approval reassessment fee” is required.
Latest articles
-
U.S. Treasury yields hit a 12
-
LinxVista is now insisting I pay a $2,100 “final transaction fee”
-
Tickmill now wants me to pay a $2,100 "account activation fee" before releasing my funds.
-
XTPBTC is now asking me to pay a $1,700 “account verification fee”
-
Firstgaininvestments unexpectedly introduced a $2,200 “withdrawal clearance surcharge”
-
COMETA is insisting I pay a $1,600 "account maintenance fee" before I can access my funds.