Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump plans WHO withdrawal on day one, experts warn of global health impacts.
{Current column}721People have watched
IntroductionThe Financial Times website reported on December 22 that President-elect Trump's team is pushin ...
The What are the domestic foreign exchange dealers?Financial Times website reported on December 22 that President-elect Trump's team is pushing for the U.S. to announce its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) on the first day of his presidency. According to sources, this decision may be officially announced on January 20, the day Trump takes the oath of office.
The report, quoting expert opinions, states that as the largest financial contributor to the WHO, the U.S. withdrawal would have a "catastrophic" impact on global public health. The WHO faces the risk of significant budget cuts and could lose crucial support in dealing with global public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Experts warn that this move would severely weaken the WHO's ability to coordinate global health affairs, particularly hindering efforts in vaccine development, disease prevention, and health infrastructure support. Moreover, the U.S. exit from the WHO might trigger a ripple effect in the international community, exacerbating resource scarcity and uncertainty in global health governance.
Trump's team has not yet officially commented on this plan, but the news has already sparked widespread discussion. Many public health experts and international organizations have expressed concern about this possibility, urging the new administration to reconsider the decision to avoid irreversible negative impacts on global public health security.
Background Analysis
The U.S. previously announced its withdrawal from the WHO in 2020, but the Biden administration rejoined in 2021. Trump's team once again pushing for an exit from the WHO raises profound concerns about U.S. health policy and prospects for global cooperation. How the international community will respond to potential changes will be a major challenge for global health governance.
The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
kriskopy imposed a $1,860 “security audit fee” , anyone met this? I need help
{Current column}This fee was never communicated during account opening or verification. I assumed withdrawals would ...
Read moreThe Brazilian government advances spending controls to stabilize finances and ease budget pressure.
{Current column}The Brazilian government is actively engaging in high-level discussions to reach crucial spending co ...
Read moreSQLQD has demanded me a $950 “security verification charge”
{Current column}This fee was never mentioned during registration or anywhere in their terms. Despite completing full ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Prestige Capital Strategies forced me to pay a $980 “account clearance payment”
- Gulf nations urge U.S. to stop Israel’s attack on Iranian oil facilities to prevent escalation.
- Germany’s exports and output fell; Trump’s re
- Prime FX CFD imposed a $870 “final compliance payment” as a last
- GlobeInvestFX required me to pay a $980 account clearance payment
- Victim Loses $100,000 in Coiny8v Cryptocurrency Scam: What You Need to Know
Latest articles
-
[Morning Market] Inflation Pressure Eases, Major Event Tonight
-
U.S. September CPI beats expectations, may impact Fed policy.
-
[Early Trade] Slight Cooling in Demand, Gold Prices Continue to Fluctuate
-
Bank of England may cut rates again, pound eyes 200
-
Metaindextrade forced me to pay “account clearance payment”? Why?
-
Bank of Japan may hike rates in January, unaffected by Prime Minister's remarks.