Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
The Trump administration requests the removal of the credit card late fee cap.
{Current column}51287People have watched
IntroductionOn April 14, the Trump administration requested the federal court to revoke the new regulations set ...

On April 14, the Trump administration requested the federal court to revoke the new regulations set by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) regarding credit card late fee caps. The government aligned with the business and banking groups that, in a lawsuit, argued the regulation violated the law. According to these regulations, the fee cap for late payments is set at $8, unless the card issuer can prove it necessary to charge a higher fee to cover costs.
The Trump administration, alongside the business groups involved in the lawsuit, filed documents with the federal court in Texas, requesting Fort Worth Federal District Judge Mark Pittman to make a final ruling terminating the late fee regulation. Judge Pittman had previously blocked the CFPB from implementing this regulation, which is part of Democratic President Biden's initiative to combat "junk fees."
The Trump administration had previously attempted to dissolve the CFPB but was partially blocked by the courts. A federal appeals court ruled that the government could reduce the staff of the CFPB but could not completely eliminate the agency. Since its inception, the CFPB has faced criticism from Republicans, accusing it of lacking accountability and overstepping its powers through enforcement actions against financial companies.
According to the original CFPB regulation, card issuers with over one million active accounts could not charge more than $8 in late fees unless they could demonstrate that higher fees were necessary to cover actual costs. Last December, Judge Pittman ruled that this regulation violated the 2009 Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act, which limits excessive fees but allows card issuers to charge "penalty" fees when customers breach credit card agreements.
This lawsuit and the Trump administration's involvement signify a further escalation in the dispute over CFPB's regulatory power and fee regulations.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
[Morning Market] Inflation Pressure Eases, Major Event Tonight
{Current column}Gold Market:Last night (August 13), the U.S. Department of Labor released the July Producer Price In ...
Read moreUS Stock Futures Steady; Anticipation of Nvidia Earnings Elevates Nasdaq to Record High
{Current column}U.S. stock index futures remained largely unchanged in evening trading on Monday. This came after a ...
Read moreWhat is a Trading Member? How does one become a Trading Member?
{Current column}What is a Trading Member?A trading member refers to an institution or individual registered with a s ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Victim Loses $100,000 in Coiny8v Cryptocurrency Scam: What You Need to Know
- Lingjun Investment Restricted from Trading by Shanghai and Shenzhen Exchanges
- The Top 10 Forex Traders in History
- META's stock price soars over 46%! Zuckerberg successfully surpasses old rival Musk.
- Rising rent pressures low
- What does T+1 stock settlement mean? Common questions.
Latest articles
-
Victim Loses $100,000 in Coiny8v Cryptocurrency Scam: What You Need to Know
-
Alibaba intraday: The short
-
Financial Market Summary for December 14, 2023
-
Diverging Trends in Holdings of US Treasury Securities by Japan and China
-
OffizielleKryptoBorse blocked my $2,100 withdrawal
-
Financial Market Summary for December 14, 2023