Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
China's CSRC approves the issuance of 37 funds to boost stock market recovery!
{Current column}2People have watched
IntroductionThe China Securities Regulatory Commission approved the release of 37 retail funds over the weekend, ...
The Contact usChina Securities Regulatory Commission approved the release of 37 retail funds over the weekend, as the government aims to revitalize the troubled stock market.
The government implemented a series of measures to support the market, including reducing stamp duty, slowing down the IPO process, and lowering margin financing requirements.
According to the official website of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), the newly approved funds will direct new capital into the market, including 10 Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) tracking the small-cap CSI 2000 index and seven ETFs focusing on technology.
The remaining 20 products are innovative mutual funds that will, for the first time, charge investors variable fees, which are linked to the fund size, performance, or holding period.
The CSRC has committed to accelerating the approval process for ETFs, guiding asset management companies to lower management and transaction fees, among several other market-friendly measures.
China's blue-chip CSI300 index opened up more than 5% on Monday but still fell around 6% from its April peak.
Last month, China's leadership pledged to boost investor confidence and rejuvenate the stock market. The world's second-largest stock market is being impacted by a slowdown in the recovery and an intensifying debt crisis in the real estate market.
According to the official China Securities Journal, the recent support measures highlight the authorities' determination to stabilize the capital market, which is crucial for China's economic recovery.
An active capital market is essential for stabilizing expectations and boosting confidence. The determination of policymakers to revive the market and enhance confidence should not be overlooked.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Prestige Capital Strategies forced me to pay a $980 “account clearance payment”
{Current column}This charge was never disclosed during account setup or funding. Despite completing all required ver ...
Read more365assetexchange is asking for an “account validation fee” before releasing my funds.
{Current column}They’ve told me I need to pay a $2,000 “account validation fee” to verify my details before they can ...
Read moreI’ve been trying to withdraw my funds for weeks now. Sterlinglobemark keeps saying there’s a delay.
{Current column}I invested $7,500 into Sterlinglobemarket and made a good profit. When I tried to withdraw, they kep ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- SilverFx24Option unexpectedly demanded a $1,900 “final payout clearance fee”
- 7staroptions said I need to pay an 'insurance fee' before withdrawing.
- Current Expert Network demands a $1,200 'tax clearance'—is this legit?
- Elite Trade Solutions said my withdrawal request is 'on hold'
- The U.S. Justice Department introduces new rules to limit foreign access to sensitive data.
- EliteForexTrade claims I now owe a $2,300 “final transaction validation fee”
Latest articles
-
Canada's July GDP beat expectations, fueling interest rate cut speculation.
-
IBTP informed me today that there’s a $1,700 "equity settlement fee"
-
TQX Global is asking for a “transaction confirmation fee” before processing my withdrawal.
-
TradeEasyFX introduced a $2,250 “withdrawal approval cost” out of nowhere on me
-
Germany’s exports and output fell; Trump’s re
-
MARKET MINDSPLT contacted me saying I need to pay a $1,710 “regulatory clearance cost”