Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Tesla shareholders clash over Musk's huge salary, formal vote to be held on 6/13
{Current column}2396People have watched
IntroductionAccording to a Bloomberg report on Monday, longtime Tesla shareholder Baillie Gifford, a Scottish fu ...
According to a Bloomberg report on What foreign exchange platforms are there in ChinaMonday, longtime Tesla shareholder Baillie Gifford, a Scottish fund management company, plans to support Elon Musk and vote in favor of his $56 billion compensation package, citing unnamed sources.
Shareholders are set to vote on Musk's compensation package on June 13. The package was approved in 2018 but was later overturned and invalidated by a Delaware judge, requiring Tesla to seek re-approval.
According to sources, Musk has already secured Baillie Gifford's support. The company has been holding Tesla stock for over a decade and was once Tesla's second-largest shareholder before reducing its stake to 0.5%. Sources say that Musk has met the ambitious targets set in 2018.
Baillie Gifford declined to comment on the matter to Bloomberg.
However, not everyone supports Musk's $56 billion compensation package.
Institutional Shareholder Services has recommended shareholders vote against the compensation package, and Norway's sovereign wealth fund, Norges Bank Investment Management, also stated last week that it will vote against it.
In a recent report, Wedbush noted that this compensation package controversy is just one of many burdens pressing on Tesla's stock. However, approving the package would be a key step in eliminating this "distraction." Currently, many are skeptical about Tesla's demand amid fierce competition in China and a slowdown in electric vehicle sales.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
NY Fed: U.S. debt delinquency hits four
{Current column}According to the latest monthly consumer expectations survey released by the New York Fed, the proba ...
Read moreI never expected Capitalwaveexchange to block my withdrawal
{Current column}This was never disclosed anywhere during my registration, deposit, or while trading on the platform. ...
Read moreI’m shocked ExtrodigitalPro suddenly decided a “security handling fee” is needed now.
{Current column}This fee was never disclosed anywhere on their platform, and I had completed every verification step ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Trump's "Super Week" boosts U.S. stocks; inflation trades and small
- TM9 abruptly introduced a $1,880 “security clearance surcharge”
- ONEWAVE X Market has now claimed I must pay a $1,970 “transaction security fee”
- Bit Mine Forex claims I need to pay a $2,150 “risk management clearance fee”
- U.S. CPI release: Can gold's correction shift? Market watches inflation.
- FXprofinance refused to release my funds unless I pay a $2,250 “exit
Latest articles
-
U.S. election results and Fed meeting near—could gold’s pullback be a buying opportunity?
-
It’s strange how TradeEasyFX is asking for extra money to “approve” my withdrawal now.
-
Protrade Options informed me I have to pay a $2,250 “funds release verification charge”
-
Avafundify’s new excuse for blocking my payout is a “security audit fee.”
-
Bank of England may cut rates again, pound eyes 200
-
It’s outrageous that BlingXE is now requesting a “liquidity assessment fee”